Getting Xfree86 run on IBM laptop

14 replies [Last post]
boby_dg's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 8 2004
Posts: 102

I recently installed Peanut Linux 7.3 on my laptop (IBM Thinkpad 760CD) ,but it's nightmare to get Xfree86 running .I google so much but didn't find nothing about it.The graphic chip is Trident 9320. The screen is 12,1" 16-bit color 800x600 TFT.It ran only one time with 640x480 with 16 colors (bliaaa Sad I just cant watch it).Does someone of you had ever installed linux on laptop like this.I'll really be happy if someone send me a ready working xf86config file for it.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Jon's picture
Jon
Offline
Joined: Dec 20 2003
Posts: 2804
Have you ried running it with

Have you ried running it with any of the non-accellerated drivers? VGA/XGA/VESA? If you can at least get basic support for it through VESA modes life would be better...

EDIT: And it's always a good idea to search for related models and such of the same series: Linux on a 760C

__________________

I am not in this world to live up to other people's expectations, nor do I feel that the world must live up to mine. - Fritz Perls

boby_dg's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 8 2004
Posts: 102
With the generic servers and

With the generic drivers it works only on 640x480 (sometimes the screen makes hi-pitch noise and Ctrl+Alt+Backspace doesn't shut down the server the laptop crashes and the shut down is possible only with the "emergency" shutdown switch on back side).I tried all the XF86Config files I could find on the net ,but they all didn't worked (most of them gave error in Section "Files") the XFree86 is 3.3.5 ,shall I update it .And how.

boby_dg's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 8 2004
Posts: 102
Now the X starts in 800x600 (

Now the X starts in 800x600 (after rewritten the XF86Config file by hand ,something was happened to it it was full only with dots) ,but there's something wrong with the modes - the only one working is 800x600 @ 72 Hz but when I start the server with it the screen looks like a lot of repeating segments ,and when the mouse gets in one of them I have then about 20 cursors on screen. I think it's timing problem .Can someone write me the correct modeline for 800x600@72 on the TFT Screen of my laptop ?

Jon's picture
Jon
Offline
Joined: Dec 20 2003
Posts: 2804
You might try 800x600x60.

You might try 800x600x60.

__________________

I am not in this world to live up to other people's expectations, nor do I feel that the world must live up to mine. - Fritz Perls

boby_dg's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 8 2004
Posts: 102
No ,it only works on 72 Hz. O

No ,it only works on 72 Hz. On 60 or smaller the screen remains blank after starting the server.And Ctrl Alt and Bspc doesnt help - only Ctrl Alt and Del.

rael9's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 26 2003
Posts: 215
Colors

Try lowering the number of colors it's displaying. i.e. - If it's set to 24 bit color, lower it to 16 bit color.

__________________

James M. Baker
----------
Computer Nerd
----------
[url=http://rael.webhop.org"]My site[/url]

boby_dg's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 8 2004
Posts: 102
It is set to 8-bit color.

It is set to 8-bit color.
It works fine with 640x480 on 8-bit ,but I want 800x600 at 16 bit color.
640x480 doesnt work with 16-bit - ti say no screens found

rael9's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 26 2003
Posts: 215
Color

OK, if it's set to 8 bit at the moment, have you tried 16 bit? Also, which version of XFree86 is it running?

__________________

James M. Baker
----------
Computer Nerd
----------
[url=http://rael.webhop.org"]My site[/url]

boby_dg's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 8 2004
Posts: 102
I'm running Xfree86 3.3.5 !I

I'm running Xfree86 3.3.5 !I am new to linux and don't know how to update it to 4.With 16-bit color it doesn't want to start.Gives me No screens error.

rael9's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 26 2003
Posts: 215
Peanut

I honestly don't know enough about Peanut Linux to be able to tell you. And I can't look at their site for more than 2 minutes at a time without getting a headache. Personally, I would try a different distro. Being a newb, You might want to try Libranet, or SuSE. Maybe Fedora. If you're feeling really daring, you could try Debian or one of the BSDs. I don't know how well the BSDs work on laptops from experience, though.

__________________

James M. Baker
----------
Computer Nerd
----------
[url=http://rael.webhop.org"]My site[/url]

boby_dg's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 8 2004
Posts: 102
Yes ,I'll maybe try Debian I

Yes ,I'll maybe try Debian I have disks of it.I am also impressed of SuSE.Maybe I'll order Suse tomorrow.I need compact distro ,because I have only 1.2Gb HDD and I need Windows 98SE also installed.

rael9's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 26 2003
Posts: 215
Debian

Then Debian would probably be a good choice. You can do a minimal install and then add things as you see fit. The other distros tend to need quite a bit of room.

__________________

James M. Baker
----------
Computer Nerd
----------
[url=http://rael.webhop.org"]My site[/url]

boby_dg's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 8 2004
Posts: 102
I installed Debian GNU/Linux

I installed Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 yesterday. The manual says 400Mb + X and most programs.I ****** up things abit and now I don't have X but today I'll add it.

rael9's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 26 2003
Posts: 215
If you end up having problems

If you end up having problems with it, try Libranet. It's based upon Debian, but the install process and the administration of it are quite a bit easier.

That being said, it doesn't hurt to have some background in Debian it's tools (i.e. - apt-get) in case things go bad.

__________________

James M. Baker
----------
Computer Nerd
----------
[url=http://rael.webhop.org"]My site[/url]