Server Operating System for Pentium II

10 replies [Last post]
Tom
Offline
Joined: Jan 31 2004
Posts: 100

I've been running Sambar on my Win2000 machine for the past few months serving up MLAgazine's images. We've had a surge recently, and I need to be able to host our MySQL database and about 600 MB of images each day.

Right now, I've decided that I will probably have to jump to some UNIX like OS, to be able to run MySQL easily. Is Solaris 9 a good choice, or is there an easier solution?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Eudimorphodon's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 21 2003
Posts: 1204
Re: Server Operating System for Pentium II

Tom wrote:

Right now, I've decided that I will probably have to jump to some UNIX like OS, to be able to run MySQL easily. Is Solaris 9 a good choice, or is there an easier solution?

If you want "ease of use", Solaris x86 is probably the worst possible option.

(It's not that Solaris is really any more difficult then a medium-unfriendly Linux like Slackware, but it's *much* more poorly documented, has terribly narrow hardware support, and doesn't have much of a community to turn to for answers.)

FreeBSD would be worth considering, given the hardware you're suggesting. The "ports collection" in FreeBSD makes it fairly easy to install just what you need.

--Peace

Offline
Joined: Dec 20 2003
Posts: 455
I actually run windows 2003 s

I actually run windows 2003 server and windows 2000 on my dual pentium 2 450 and my dual pentium 3 600 boxes respectively.

I dunno, i like them. They are easy to use and comfortable for me and they are rock solid. I never have to reboot them unless the power goes out and kills them.

The dual pentium 2 450 has 512 megs of ram and the dual penitum 3 600 has 768 megs of ram (ram REALLY helps server operating systems).

__________________

I play Atari while eating my string cheeze!

Tom
Offline
Joined: Jan 31 2004
Posts: 100
I was thinking of Solaris bec

I was thinking of Solaris because I install and go, with little manual configuration. I'll look into FreeBSD, I've used NetBSD on my SE/30 before.

Blackstealth's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 20 2003
Posts: 119
Suse?

Pentium IIs take kindly to Suse linux assuming you've got a decent amount of Ram in there (say 128Mb min.). I've actually spent the day installing Suse on 6 sub 500Mhz machines, a mixture of PIIs and K6-2s (for a little proof of concept project I'm working on), and its runs very snappily. I've yet to see how MySQL performs tho' - that's tomorrows job...

__________________

Fell Faller :-: An account of travels and adventures in the Lakes, Peaks and Dales of England.

martakz's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 20 2003
Posts: 634
How fast does KDX run on your

How fast does KDE run on your 500mhz machine?

__________________

Now using x86 machines. Bye bye iMac266 (Strawberry), G3 1400 and the G3 IIsi.

Joined: Sep 13 2004
Posts: 1
Sprekinze MAC

I thought this was a MAC forum? Mac OS

Dr. Webster's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 19 2003
Posts: 1687
Re: Sprekinze MAC

Reality Concepts wrote:

I thought this was a MAC forum? Mac OS

Not when it's in the Other Computers forum.

__________________

Applefritter Admin

Offline
Joined: Dec 20 2003
Posts: 211
The most recent versions of K

The most recent versions of KDE and Gnome are about as demanding as MS Windows in my experience. If a PC runs Windows 2000/XP to your satisfaction then you'll enjoy KDE or Gnome; if Windows 2000/XP is too sluggish, you may find that your Linux desktop is no snappier. KDE and Gnome aren't the only desktops, of course.

Phil

Tom
Offline
Joined: Jan 31 2004
Posts: 100
I ended up settling for SuSE.

I ended up settling for SuSE. I'll be switching over shortly.

Offline
Joined: Dec 20 2003
Posts: 455
Is enlightenment still used a

Is enlightenment still used as a window mananger for the newer linux builds? And is it as processor intensive as kde/gnome?

__________________

I play Atari while eating my string cheeze!