I'm seeing some discussions getting quashed based on apparently unacceptable content.
dan k
I'm seeing some discussions getting quashed based on apparently unacceptable content.
dan k
No Ads.
No Trackers.
No Social Media.
All Content Locally Hosted.
40 Gigabytes and Growing.
Always Free.
Please consider contributing.
This page, the entire Applefritter site, and all subsites of are copyright 1999-2999 by Tom Owad unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, Mac, MacOS, MacBook, iMac, and Mac Pro are trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this site (the feeling's mutual).
Is it totally unacceptable to discuss any aspect of what's being referred to as 'piracy'? I can understand not wanting to provide active help for those who wish to circumvent legal software distribution channels, but is it absolutely neccessary to cut off any and all discussions that even bring up the topic? That's going alot farther than I think is necessary.
The biggest issue as I see it is that AppleFritter has no easily accessable set of rules, so it's not all that easy for posters to know where the line is.
dan k
The thread I locked a little while back wasn't locked just because of software piracy. There were many posts that were, simply put, useless--they were just berating the original poster. And that's also why the subsequent thread was locked; it just picked up where the first thread left off.