Speed Freak

11 posts / 0 new
Last post
Offline
Last seen: 10 years 7 months ago
Joined: Dec 19 2003 - 14:45
Speed Freak

Has anyone here used this interesting application.

http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/23412

I have it installed and am testing it; not for my need, as I have a dual 1.2 GHz G4, but for older/slower macs. My wife is driving a dual 533 G4, and frequently complains of its slowness. I have a couple kids with 400 & 450 MHz iMacs that would benefit if this proves useful.

Rick Smile

Offline
Last seen: 7 years 1 month ago
Joined: Apr 15 2004 - 22:11
No change was noticed on an 6

No change was noticed on an 600mhz/640mb/20gb iBook (Dual USB)

Offline
Last seen: 10 years 7 months ago
Joined: Dec 19 2003 - 14:45
Speed Freak

I, also didn't see any improvements using it. Using MacTheRipper, I extracted a 7.5 GB Main Feature DVD, twice. Without SF, it took 25 Min, 36 Sec. With SF enabled, it took 25 Min. 32 Sec.

Not much of a gain.

Rick Smile

madmax_2069's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 years 8 months ago
Joined: Sep 24 2005 - 07:28
if you use OS X on any of the

if you use OS X on any of the machines have you ever tryed shadow killer i did on my Beige G3 AIO in OS X 10.2.8 and it speeded it up allot.

Offline
Last seen: 10 years 7 months ago
Joined: Dec 19 2003 - 14:45
shadow killer

I tried searching for Shadow Killer, but couldn't find it.

Rick Smile

Offline
Last seen: 3 months 2 weeks ago
Joined: Jan 19 2005 - 23:30
ive used shadow killer and it

ive used shadow killer and it does help, but makes it harder to use alot of windows at once.

eeun's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 weeks 6 hours ago
Joined: Dec 19 2003 - 17:34
A google search for "OS X Sha

A google search for "OS X Shadow Killer" brought it up as the first link.

Here it is.

Tom Owad's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 6 hours ago
Joined: Dec 16 2003 - 15:14
Re: Speed Freak

smileyme wrote:
I, also didn't see any improvements using it. Using MacTheRipper, I extracted a 7.5 GB Main Feature DVD, twice. Without SF, it took 25 Min, 36 Sec. With SF enabled, it took 25 Min. 32 Sec.

Start a slew of background tasks and then try it again.

Offline
Last seen: 10 years 7 months ago
Joined: Dec 19 2003 - 14:45
Background tests

I was running quite a few, including Azureus which uses about 15% processor. I had Activity Monitor on when acceletating MTR, and even though I had SF set to decelerate other Apps, Azureus continued to use the same amount of processor.

I didn't test this on my wife's computer, but I wasn't impressed with the results on mine.

Rick Smile

Offline
Last seen: 9 years 1 month ago
Joined: Sep 21 2004 - 01:45
All it is...

is a graphical renicer. Unix has the command line command renice, and this is a front end for it. If you google OS X graphical renicer or renice you ought to come up with a few of these.

Offline
Last seen: 10 years 7 months ago
Joined: Dec 19 2003 - 14:45
Unix

I am just starting to learn about Unix. Up until now I have just been a user with no real understanding. I noticed when I had the activity monitor up and activated SF, most of the processor activity transfered from "User" to "Nice". Can you explain just what "Nice" is and what it does?

Rick Smile

Log in or register to post comments