Powertower 200 and OS X

10 posts / 0 new
Last post
themike's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 6 months ago
Joined: Jul 21 2004 - 19:33
Powertower 200 and OS X

Hi all, I have in my possession a Powercenter 200, basically stock, and I am trying to find out if I can install (and use) any version of OS X. I've tried google and I haven't found much information.

dankephoto's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 2 weeks ago
Joined: Dec 20 2003 - 10:38
yes

see the XPostFacto compatibility page.

I forget it that's a 604 or 603 based system . . . with the stock processor you're limited to 10.2, but upgrade to a G3/G4 CPU and you can use up through Tiger (so far.)

dan k

themike's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 6 months ago
Joined: Jul 21 2004 - 19:33
603?

I think its a 603e...any idea what the performance for 10.2 (thats Jaguar, right?) would be on this machine? And how much ram do you think I need?

EDIT
No, its a 604e. I also was reading on the xPostFacto page that the built in video won't work with OS X, so I'm going to have to find a PCI video card I guess. Is OS pretty good about supporting random video cards?

gobabushka's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 months 1 week ago
Joined: Apr 26 2004 - 16:30
i ran 10.1 on my umax c500, i

i ran 10.1 on my umax c500, its got a 240 mhz 603e with 144 mb ram. it did the job ok. but i would stick with classic mac os on it.

themike's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 6 months ago
Joined: Jul 21 2004 - 19:33
Thanks for the info. I think

Thanks for the info. I think at this point I'll put os 9 on it if I do anything at all. I don't have much these days I need to keep a classic machine around for.

alk
alk's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 4 weeks ago
Joined: Dec 20 2003 - 10:38
PowerCenter or PowerTower?

Which is it?

It might make a slight difference. PowerCenters are based on the 7200 motherboard whereas PowerTowers are based on the 9500 motherboard. The 9500 has pretty decent support in OS X, but I don't know how well Catalyst (7200) motherboards are supported...

Peace,
Drew

themike's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 years 6 months ago
Joined: Jul 21 2004 - 19:33
PowerTower

Its a PowerTower, sorry I confused that. So far as I've found there isn't an actual difference, though, where did you find that out?

alk
alk's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 4 weeks ago
Joined: Dec 20 2003 - 10:38
You are right.

I was thinking of the PowerTower Pro which uses the Tsunami board (9500). The PowerTower does indeed use the Catalyst board (7200) which is the same as the PowerCenter.

That makes me wonder a bit about PCC. For their high-end line, they had the PowerWave which was based on Tsunami, and they replaced that line with the PowerTower Catalyst boards only to go back to Tsunami with the PowerTower Pro. That's a little strange...

Peace,
Drew

Hawaii Cruiser's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 3 months ago
Joined: Jan 20 2005 - 16:03
Everymac

A place to "find that out":

Mac Clones info

The Catalyst and the Tanzania motherboards--them's were strange days. Apple's attempts at economical. Thankfully Steve Jobs came back and cured Apple of such self-defeating, near fatal behaviors--mostly.

alk
alk's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 4 weeks ago
Joined: Dec 20 2003 - 10:38
AFAIK, PCC never used Tanzani

AFAIK, PCC never used Tanzania. That was mostly Motorola. PCC's low end was Alchemy based. Alchemy was a strange beast with its heritage back in the Quadra 630. Valkerie video kicked butt back in the day, but by the time the 6500 came it, it was handily beaten by ATI's Rage II chipset...

Catalyst wasn't a bad design, either. In fact, PCC showed that Catalyst had a lot of headroom in it's design. But Tsunami had the expansion that Catalyst didn't. So it surprises me that PCC would go back and forth between the two in their high-end line instead of extending one or the other.

Peace,
Drew

Log in or register to post comments